Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36133734

RESUMO

Background: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is one of the most common anxiety disorders among adolescents. It is associated with extensive distress and negative long-term consequences. Generic cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the preferred treatments for anxiety disorders, but it has shown poorer outcome for adolescents with SAD than for other anxiety disorders. Aim: As preparation for a randomized controlled trial the aim of the present study was to examine the feasibility of an adjusted diagnosis-specific CBT group intervention for adolescents with SAD, and provide preliminary information on adolescent and family outcomes. Method: Thirteen adolescents (age 12-17 years) diagnosed with SAD received a group therapy version of the Cool Kids Anxiety Program, Social Enhanced (CK-E), a program developed at Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. The treatment is a diagnosis-specific manualized CBT treatment for adolescents with SAD. Semi-diagnostic interviews and questionnaires were completed at baseline, post, 3-month follow-up and 1-year follow-up. Results: Thirteen adolescents participated with no drop-outs. Most families attended all 10 intervention sessions. The families were generally satisfied with the treatment and would recommend it to others in need. Preliminary outcomes showed that participants had marked improvements in their anxiety symptoms and life interference, with significant medium to large baseline-post effect sizes durable at 1-year follow-up. Two of the adolescents were free of their SAD diagnosis at 3-month follow-up. Conclusion: Results from this feasibility study indicate that the Danish-translated and revised version of Cool Kids Anxiety Program - Social Enhanced could be a feasible intervention for Danish adolescents with SAD. The intervention will be investigated further in a randomized controlled trial.

2.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 19(4): 579-591, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33527304

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) are expected to be used for priority setting of hospital-dispensed medicines in Denmark from 2021. The aim of this study was to develop the first Danish value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on interviews with a representative sample of the Danish adult population. METHODS: A nationally representative sample based on age (> 18 years), gender, education, and geographical region was recruited using data provided by Statistics Denmark. Computer-assisted personal interviews were carried out using the EQ-VT 2.1. Respondents each valued ten health states using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and seven health states using discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Different predictive models were explored using cTTO and DCE data alone or in combination as hybrid models. Model performance was assessed using logical consistency. RESULTS: A total of 1014 interviews were included in the analyses. The sample was representative of the Danish adult population, though the sample contained slightly more respondents with higher education than in the general population. Only the heteroscedastic censored hybrid model combining cTTO and DCE data yielded consistent results, and hence was chosen for modelling the final Danish value set. The predicted values ranged from - 0.757 to 1, and anxiety/depression was the dimension assigned most value by respondents. CONCLUSIONS: This study established the Danish EQ-5D-5L value set, which represents the preferences of the Danish general population, and is expected to provide key input for healthcare decision-making in a Danish context.


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Humanos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
BMJ Open ; 10(1): e031670, 2020 01 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31992604

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of telehealthcare in heart failure patients as add-on to usual care. DESIGN: A cost-utility analysis was conducted from a public payer perspective alongside the randomised controlled TeleCare North trial. SETTING: The North Denmark Region, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 274 heart failure patients with self-reported New York Heart Association class II-IV. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in the intervention group were provided with a Telekit consisting of a tablet, a digital blood pressure monitor, and a scale and were instructed to perform measurements one to two times a week. The responsibility of the education, instructions and monitoring of the heart failure (HF) patients was placed on municipality nurses trained in HF and telemonitoring. Both groups received usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost-effectiveness was reported as incremental net monetary benefit (NMB). A micro-costing approach was applied to evaluate the derived savings in the first year in the public health sector. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained were estimated using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire at baseline and at a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Data for 274 patients were included in the main analysis. The telehealthcare solution provided a positive incremental NMB of £5164. The 1-year adjusted QALY difference between the telehealthcare solution and the usual care group was 0.0034 (95% CI: -0.0711 to 0.0780). The adjusted difference in costs was -£5096 (95% CI: -8736 to -1456) corresponding to a reduction in total healthcare costs by 35%. All sensitivity analyses showed the main results were robust. CONCLUSIONS: The TeleCare North solution for monitoring HF was highly cost-effective. There were significant cost savings on hospitalisations, primary care contacts and total costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02860013.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Monitorização Ambulatorial/métodos , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Computadores de Mão , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dinamarca , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Monitorização Ambulatorial/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Telemedicina/economia
4.
Value Health ; 21(2): 239-247, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29477406

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness analyses of patient-tailored complex interventions. METHODS: Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed on data from a randomized controlled trial evaluating a patient-tailored case management strategy for patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). LCA was conducted on detailed process variables representing service variation in the intervention group. Features of the identified latent classes were compared for consistency with baseline demographic, clinical, and economic characteristics for each class. Classes for the control group, corresponding to the identified latent classes for the intervention group, were identified using multinomial logistic regression. Cost-utility analyses were then conducted at the class level, and uncertainty surrounding the point estimates was assessed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The LCA identified three distinct classes: the psychologically care class, the extensive COPD care class, and the limited COPD care class. Patient baseline characteristics were in line with the features identified in the LCA. Evaluation of cost-effectiveness revealed highly disparate results, and case management for only the extensive COPD care class appeared cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £26,986 per quality-adjusted life-year gained using the threshold value set by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that researchers evaluating patient-tailored complex interventions need to address both supply-side variation and demand-side heterogeneity to link findings with outcome. The article specifically proposes the use of LCA because it is believed to have the potential to enable more appropriate targeting of complex care strategies.


Assuntos
Administração de Caso/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Dinamarca , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 29(5): 693-698, 2017 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28992155

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes towards accreditation and the Danish Quality Model (DDKM) among hospital employees in Denmark. Negative attitudes led the Danish Government to abolish accreditation in 2015. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was carried out via web-based questionnaire. SETTING: All hospital managers, quality improvement staff (quality managers and employees), and hospital surveyors in Denmark; and clinicians (doctors and nurses) within nine selected specialties. PARTICIPANTS: Overall response rate was 29% with 5055 of 17 646 valid responses included in the data analysis. The response rate was 82% (5055/6188) among respondents who clicked on the link in the mail containing the questionnaire. METHODS: A short questionnaire was designed using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 'strongly disagree' to 7 'strongly agree'. To compare mean values between respondent groups, regression analysis using dummy coding of respondent groups and calculation of standardized mean difference effect sizes were performed. RESULTS: Overall attitudes were supportive, with physicians more skeptical. There were different patterns of attitudes in the five Danish regions and between medical professions. A small group of physicians was extremely negative. CONCLUSION: Clinical attitudes are important, and can affect Government decisions. On the basis of our study, future attention should be paid to attitudes towards accreditation (and attitudes towards other means of quality improvement). Attitudes may reflect political agendas and impede the take-up of improvement programs, cause their demise, or reduce their effectiveness.


Assuntos
Acreditação , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Dinamarca , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Melhoria de Qualidade , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 29(3): 406-411, 2017 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28419255

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of unannounced versus announced surveys in detecting non-compliance with accreditation standards in public hospitals. DESIGN: A nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: All public hospitals in Denmark were invited. Twenty-three hospitals (77%) (3 university hospitals, 5 psychiatric hospitals and 15 general hospitals) agreed to participate. INTERVENTION: Twelve hospitals were randomized to receive unannounced surveys (intervention group) and eleven hospitals to receive announced surveys (control group). We hypothesized that the hospitals receiving the unannounced surveys would reveal a higher degree of non-compliance with accreditation standards than the hospitals receiving announced surveys. Nine surveyors trained and employed by the Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Healthcare (IKAS) were randomized into teams and conducted all surveys. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The outcome was the surveyors' assessment of the hospitals' level of compliance with 113 performance indicators-an abbreviated set of the Danish Healthcare Quality Programme (DDKM) version 2, covering organizational standards, patient pathway standards and patient safety standards. Compliance with performance indicators was analyzed using binomial regression analysis with bootstrapped robust standard errors. RESULTS: In all, 16 202 measurements were acceptable for data analysis. The risk of observing non-compliance with performance indicators for the intervention group compared with the control group was statistically insignificant (risk difference (RD) = -0.6 percentage points [-2.51-1.31], P = 0.54). A converged analysis of the six patient safety critical standards, requiring 100% compliance to gain accreditation status revealed no statistically significant difference (RD = -0.78 percentage points [-4.01-2.44], P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Unannounced hospital surveys were not more effective than announced surveys in detecting quality problems in Danish hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02348567, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348567?term=NCT02348567.


Assuntos
Acreditação/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Acreditação/normas , Dinamarca , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/normas , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 28(3): 271-7, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22980704

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2008 the Danish National Board of Health launched an information campaign aimed at introducing mini-HTA as a management and decision support tool for the municipalities. Today (January 2012), mini-HTA is still not used regularly in the municipalities. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the latent attitudes toward mini-HTA among ninety-three participants in five voluntary workshops on mini-HTA held in the period of May 2008 to February 2009. METHODS: In a questionnaire including three open questions respondents were asked to state their perception of what mini-HTA could be used for in the municipality, the main barriers for using mini-HTA, and what could make it easier to implement mini-HTA. Answers were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using binary coding and statistical examination of patterns in form of R-factor analysis. RESULTS: The four significant latent attitudes were a general acceptance of HTA-principles, a derived need for a political/managerial decision to use mini-HTA in the municipality, worries about barriers in the medium run, and worries about barriers in the short run. CONCLUSIONS: A national information campaign to support the uptake of mini-HTA in local health-care institutions was insufficient in the Danish municipalities and should have been supplemented with a strategy to secure local political/managerial willingness to use mini-HTA and the removal of short- and medium-term barriers. The implementation of local HTA should not just be seen as a question of how to increase the use of evidence in decision-making, but as a matter of reforming local decision processes.


Assuntos
Difusão de Inovações , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/métodos , Cidades , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Administrativas , Dinamarca , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
J Med Econ ; 14(6): 787-91, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21981560

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the health-related quality-of-life (QoL) in patients after elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) compared to a normal population and to study the association between QoL and number of years since surgery. METHODS: All Danish men who underwent elective surgery for AAA at the age of 65 or more in the period from 1989-2007 in Denmark were invited to participate in the survey. Of 722 patients, 375 were alive and 328 (87%) responded. The instruments EQ-5D (European Quality of life), EQ-VAS and SF-12 (Short Form Health Survey) were applied for measuring health-related QoL. Multiple regression analysis was used to study the association between QoL and number of years since AAA surgery. RESULTS: A significantly poorer QoL was found in patients having had AAA surgery compared to the normal population as measured with the SF-12 and the EQ-VAS, but not with EQ-5D. A negative association between QoL and years following surgery was found with EQ-VAS and SF-12 (PCS), but not with the other instruments. DISCUSSION: Factors such as selection bias because of mortality and non-response may have resulted in an over-estimate of the QoL in patients having had AAA surgery, thus the difference in QoL compared to the normal population was probably under-estimated. The cross-section design was inefficient for the study of the association between QoL and years since surgery, and EQ-5D may be an insensitive instrument for measuring QoL in AAA patients after surgery. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation of the study was the cross-sectional design. Males with a higher risk of death were under-represented in the sample. CONCLUSION: A poorer quality-of-life was found in patients having had elective AAA surgery compared to the normal population.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Dinamarca , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...